Compared with the local labor market
Research Data Specialist II pay vs. California
Across all employers in California, the median wage for Database Architects — about 6,210 people — is $170,160. Fish and Wildlife pays a median base salary of $101,388 for this role, 40% below that figure — about the 10th percentile of local pay for the occupation.
Where Fish and Wildlife sits in the local pay range
$101,200
$132,880
$170,160
$203,130
$227,900
Fish and Wildlife median · $101,388
The bar is the range of annual wages for Database Architects across every employer in California, from the 10th to the 90th percentile, with the middle 50% highlighted. The marker shows Fish and Wildlife’s median base salary for this role. Both figures are base pay only.
And across the country
Nationwide, the median wage for Database Architects — about 67,140 people — is $139,500. Fish and Wildlife’s median base salary is 27% below that national figure, about the 20th percentile of pay for the occupation nationally.
$86,240
$109,370
$139,500
$169,290
$204,000
Fish and Wildlife median · $101,388
Local and national wages differ for reasons beyond how well a job pays — cost of living, the mix of employers, and local demand for the occupation all move the California range relative to the national one.
Median total compensation for this role at Fish and Wildlife is $101,988, which includes overtime and employer-paid benefits. The benchmark above excludes both, so total compensation is deliberately not compared against it.
Benchmark: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (May 2025). BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) covers all employers in the area — private, non-profit, and government alike — so this is a comparison against the whole local labor market for the occupation, not against private-sector pay. OEWS wages are straight-time pay and exclude overtime, shift differentials, and employer-paid benefits, so the government figure shown here is base pay on the same basis. Total compensation is not comparable to it. Job titles are matched to the closest standard occupation, so the comparison is between similar work rather than an identical job classification.